Edouard v Symphony Fencing

JurisdictionBahamas
JudgeThompson, V.P.
Judgment Date17 November 2015
CourtIndustrial Court (Bahamas)
Date17 November 2015
Docket NumberIT/NES/1643 of 2011

Industrial Tribunal

Thompson, V.P.

IT/NES/1643 of 2011

Edouard
and
Symphony Fencing
Appearances:

No appearance by or on behalf of the applicant.

Mr. Ken Lightbourne of Counsel for the respondent.

Employment Law - Industrial dispute — Tribunal Procedure — No appearance on behalf of applicant — Application struck out for want of prosecution.

Thompson, V.P.
1

The hearing of this matter was scheduled to be heard before the Tribunal on the 17th day of November A.D., 2015. There was no appearance by or on behalf of the applicant.

2

In light of the non-appearance by or on behalf of the applicant on the scheduled date, the court acceded to an application by the respondent pursuant to Rule 12(1),(f) of the Industrial Relations (Tribunal Procedure) Rules, 2010 and the Tribunal being satisfied that the applicant was duly served the Originating Application filed herein on January 18th, 2012 is hereby struck out for want of prosecution.

AND THIS IS THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL.

Keith H. Thompson

Vice President

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT