Tamiko Valentino Arthur v R

JurisdictionBahamas
JudgeSir Michael Barnett
Judgment Date21 March 2023
Neutral CitationBS 2023 CA 38
Docket NumberSCCrApp & CAIS No. 67 of 2013 & 96 of 2016
CourtCourt of Appeal (Bahamas)

(Application to Reopen Appeals; Remand Time)

Tamiko Valentino Arthur
Applicant
and
Regina
Respondent
Before:

The Hon Sir Michael Barnett, President, Kt

The Hon Madam Justice Crane-Scott, JA

The Hon Mr Justice Evans, JA

SCCrApp & CAIS No. 67 of 2013 & 96 of 2016

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

Applicant appeared Pro Se

Ms Linda Evans, Counsel for Respondent

1

The oral judgment of the court was delivered by

2

Sir Michael Barnett, P, Kt:

3

As far as the applications to reopen the applications for extension of time to appeal are concerned, the matters have already been dealt with by this court and there are no reasons for us to reopen them. There are no exceptional circumstances to justify our reopening the appeals; therefore, the applications to reopen the appeals to revisit the issue of sentence are refused. The sentences are affirmed.

Dated this 21st day of March, 2023

_______________________

SIR MICHAEL BARNETT, P, Kt

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT